AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1941 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2450 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 352.8 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 921
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 18052
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 921 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 18052 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18052 | 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 32 | 104 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.8 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |