AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12608 vs 3163
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12608 vs 3163 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 102262
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 972
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 19691
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 102262 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 972 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 19691 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102262 | 123479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 | 999 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19691 | 22253 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12608 | 3163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 42 | 44 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |