AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25118 vs 19611
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1020 vs 927
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150050 vs 117339
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 337.794
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 31.631
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 190.996
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 1654.321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3355
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3355
- 9708x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19416 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 vs 19611 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 vs 927 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 150050 vs 117339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 337.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 31.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 190.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 1654.321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 16849
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 16849
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 16849 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 | 19611 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 | 927 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 150050 | 117339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 337.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 31.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 190.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 1654.321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 | 2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 62 | 109 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Compute units | 72 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAA40
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
