AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 18544
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 vs 785
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 vs 74179
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 488.989
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 41.461
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 153.677
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 1534.582
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3357
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3357
• Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3689 vs 3503

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 16849
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 16849

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	25004 18544
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1025 785
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	154220 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	578.52 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.561 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	291.971 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2700.97 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16849 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3374 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16849 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3720 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3374 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3689 3503

Compare specifications (specs)