AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22131 vs 12357
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 602
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 vs 12357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 vs 602 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 16162
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3373
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 16162
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3373
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7393 vs 3188
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 vs 3188 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 | 12357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 | 602 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 | 7393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Place in performance rating | 84 | 121 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |