NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 432.118
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 16162
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3719
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3373
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 16162
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3719
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3373
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 432.118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 vs 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 vs 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 vs 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22131 vs 15361
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 643
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129479 vs 92696
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 36.308
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 181.818
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1410.887
- Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3188 vs 2380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 vs 15361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 vs 643 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 vs 92696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 36.308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 181.818 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1410.887 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 vs 2380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15361 | 22131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 988 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 | 129479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 383.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 | 3188 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 81 | 84 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1290 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
| Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
