AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2608 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 1585x more texture fill rate: 333.8 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 281.3x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 830 vs 603
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13256 vs 10465
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73293 vs 47476
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 2608 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 333.8 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 830 vs 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13256 vs 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73293 vs 47476 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1437 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 2048
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1437 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 2048 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 830 | 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13256 | 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73293 | 47476 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2048 | 5536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 33 | GP104B |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 139 | 290 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2608 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1437 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 166.9 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 333.8 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13300 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |