AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2544 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 549.5 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1083 vs 999
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17053 vs 13611
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1083 vs 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125110 vs 124849 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17053 vs 13611 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 70% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 3456
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22408 vs 21823
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 3456 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22408 vs 21823 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1083 | 999 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21823 | 22408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125110 | 124849 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17053 | 13611 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1634.218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 32 | GA104 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 35 | 41 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 54 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3456 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |