AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 2544 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 549.5 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1150 vs 1088
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 vs 31 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1150 vs 1088 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- 3x more pipelines: 10240 vs 3456
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 22445
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 127132
- Around 53% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5077 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 3456 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 22445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 127132 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 vs 3316 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1150 | 1088 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22445 | 26935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 127132 | 209081 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 | 5077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 32 | GA102 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 31 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 53 | 60 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 54 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3456 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |