AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 16.3x more texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 19.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1633 vs 84
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 186
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 21 September 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 vs 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 186 |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 186 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | R400 |
Code name | Raven | R430 |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 21 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 937 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 15.68 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 980 MHz |