AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 16.3x more texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 46.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1633 vs 35
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 188
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 12 May 2003 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 vs 35 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 35 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Raven | NV35 |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 12 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 938 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
Length | 218 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | DDR |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz |