AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec
- 2.2x more pipelines: 640 vs 288
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,664 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 360
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10265 vs 6155
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.977 vs 18.62
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.177 vs 1.755
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.847 vs 24.476
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 167.399 vs 48.203
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3108
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3108
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10265 vs 6155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 vs 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 vs 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 vs 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 vs 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3108 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1986 vs 1633
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 635.018 vs 309.874
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3044 vs 2315
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3491 vs 3162
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3044 vs 2315
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3491 vs 3162
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1986 vs 1633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 vs 309.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 vs 2315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3491 vs 3162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 vs 2315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3491 vs 3162 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 1986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10265 | 6155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3108 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Raven | GF104 |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 943 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |