AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,664 gflops vs 1,155 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 225
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10265 vs 9694
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 167.399 vs 151.016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2516 vs 1633
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 29.977
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 vs 309.874
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 2.177
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 35.847
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2315
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3162
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2315
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3162

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1633 2516
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	374 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10265 9694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.977 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.874 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.177 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.847 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	167.399 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2315 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3162 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2315 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3162 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3353

Compare specifications (specs)