AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1050 MHz
1597.1x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1050 MHz
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 vs 8673
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 vs 8673

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 August 2017 vs 24 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19324 vs 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19324 vs 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3361

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

627.9x better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 345 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3723
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3723

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	8,602 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	275 Watt vs 345 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8925 vs 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8925 vs 3723

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19324

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19324

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3723

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3361

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19324	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19324	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362	3361
PassMark - G3D Mark		9580
PassMark - G2D Mark		803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		857.575
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5170

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Vega 10	Fiji
Design	Radeon RX Vega Series	AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch date	7 August 2017	24 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$649
Place in performance rating	219	216
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz	1050 MHz
Compute units	64	64
Core clock speed	1406 MHz
Floating-point performance	13.7 TFLOPs	8,602 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines	4096	4096
Pixel fill rate	107.30 GP/s
Render output units	64
Stream Processors	4096	4096
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s	268.8 GTexel / s
Texture Units	256
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	345 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	8,900 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Eyefinity
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	282 mm	191 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	1000 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	1050 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FRTC
HD3D