AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 583
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 583
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 1 February 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 512
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 399
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 1527
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27128 vs 8941
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3157
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 399 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 vs 1527 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27128 vs 8941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 414 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 3770 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 27128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Vega | Tonga |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 1 February 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 657 | 660 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 3,763 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,500 million | 5,000 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S7150
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
