AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,126 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 299
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 1237
  • Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 4657
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 1596
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 1596
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3309
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3309
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,126 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 vs 299
PassMark - G3D Mark 1527 vs 1237
Geekbench - OpenCL 8941 vs 4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3157 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3157 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
399
299
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1527
1237
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8941
4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3309
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 299
PassMark - G3D Mark 1527 1237
Geekbench - OpenCL 8941 4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3157 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3157 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile Intel UHD Graphics 630

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Vega Coffee Lake GT2
Launch date 24 November 2017 1 September 2017
Place in performance rating 665 1234
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,126 gflops 460.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512 24
Texture fill rate 35.2 GTexel / s 28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 4,500 million 189 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Memory type DDR4
Shared memory 1

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6

Technologies

Quick Sync