AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 24.4x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 244 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 9 November 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 800 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 392
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4616 vs 1494
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15038 vs 8941
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3157
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4616 vs 1494 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15038 vs 8941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 478 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1494 | 4616 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 15038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Vega | GF110 |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 663 | 660 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |