AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 8.1x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 392
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 1494
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 8941
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 3157
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 1494 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 vs 8941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 460 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1494 | 3032 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 14269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega | Tobago |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 663 | 665 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 2,080 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 |