AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 7870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3880 vs 1507
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2070 vs 1367
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2070 vs 1367
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3880 vs 1507 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 vs 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 vs 1367 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 556 vs 461
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1514
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 556 vs 461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 7870M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3880 | 1507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 556 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19490 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 7870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Heathrow |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 589 | 590 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |