AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 7870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3880 vs 1507
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2070 vs 1367
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2070 vs 1367
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2012
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3880 vs 1507
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2070 vs 1367
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2070 vs 1367

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 556 vs 461
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1514
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1514
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 556 vs 461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3880
1507
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
461
556
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
3359
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL AMD Radeon HD 7870M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3880 1507
PassMark - G2D Mark 461 556
Geekbench - OpenCL 19490
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2070 1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1514 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2070 1367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1514 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2091

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL AMD Radeon HD 7870M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Polaris 22 Heathrow
Launch date 1 February 2018 24 April 2012
Place in performance rating 589 590
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1011 MHz
Core clock speed 931 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 640
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 204.8 GB / s 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 1024 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0