AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3900 vs 3569
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19459 vs 17210
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 51.181
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1121.002
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5094
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 vs 3569 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19459 vs 17210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 vs 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 vs 1121.002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 vs 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 vs 5094 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 496 vs 471
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 vs 5.195
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 vs 75.289
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 vs 252.311
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1514
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 496 vs 471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 vs 5.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 vs 75.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 vs 252.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 | 3569 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | 496 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19459 | 17210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | 81.527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | 256.99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Wimbledon |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 605 | 607 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |