AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
  • Around 19% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3900 vs 3569
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19459 vs 17210
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 51.181
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 1121.002
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5094
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5094
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2012
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3900 vs 3569
Geekbench - OpenCL 19459 vs 17210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.971 vs 51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247 vs 1121.002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318 vs 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318 vs 5094

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M

  • 3.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 496 vs 471
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 vs 5.195
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 vs 75.289
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 vs 252.311
  • Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1514
  • Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 2070
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1514
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 496 vs 471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.355 vs 5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.527 vs 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 256.99 vs 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3692 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3692 vs 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3900
3569
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
471
496
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
19459
17210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58.971
51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1235.247
1121.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.195
5.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
75.289
81.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
252.311
256.99
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6318
5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6318
5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
3339
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL AMD Radeon HD 7970M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3900 3569
PassMark - G2D Mark 471 496
Geekbench - OpenCL 19459 17210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.971 51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247 1121.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.195 5.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.289 81.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.311 256.99
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2070 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1514 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2070 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1514 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2091 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Polaris 22 Wimbledon
Launch date 1 February 2018 24 April 2012
Place in performance rating 605 607
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1011 MHz
Core clock speed 931 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops 2,176 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 1280
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s 68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 204.8 GB / s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 1024 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0