AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 457
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19490 vs 17466
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 799.414
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 4.536
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 30.523
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 223.683
• 17.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2091 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 931 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1011 MHz
• 5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 3880
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 58.971
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 6318
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1514
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 6318
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3880 5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	461 457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19490 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.195 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2091 122

Compare specifications (specs)