AMD Radeon VII vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1138 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 432.24 GT/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16450 vs 12354
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92182 vs 61755
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 vs 153.117
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 1722.138
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 11.901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1138 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16450 vs 12354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92182 vs 61755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 vs 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 11.901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 788
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 126.528 vs 69.256
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1172.788 vs 499.927
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12822 vs 11724
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12822 vs 11724
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 vs 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 vs 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 vs 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 vs 11724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16450 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 788 | 828 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92182 | 61755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 11.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 126.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 1172.788 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
GCN generation | 5th Gen | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 238 | 241 |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,230 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |