AMD Radeon VII vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon VII and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 432.24 GT/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16660 vs 15308
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 711
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91667 vs 64226
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 vs 194.277
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 1916.09
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 17.951
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.256 vs 31.471
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9325 vs 8770
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16660 vs 15308 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 711 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91667 vs 64226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 vs 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 vs 31.471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 vs 8770 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 545.751 vs 499.927
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11724
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11724
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 vs 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 11724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16660 | 15308 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 711 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91667 | 64226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 20 | GP102 |
Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
GCN generation | 5th Gen | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $5,999 |
Place in performance rating | 225 | 226 |
Price now | $699.99 | $4,403.52 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.74 | 3.90 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,230 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |