AMD Radeon VII vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon VII and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 432.24 GT/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 91866 vs 72384
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 2513.321
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 19.708
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.256 vs 43.083
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11724 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11724 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 vs 6 April 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91866 vs 72384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 19.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 vs 43.083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 16604
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 786
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 206.353
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 vs 499.927
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10128 vs 9325
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 16604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 786 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 vs 206.353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 vs 499.927 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10128 vs 9325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16604 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91866 | 72384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 256.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 2513.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 19.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 43.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 1139.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9325 | 10128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon VII | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 20 | GP102 |
Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
GCN generation | 5th Gen | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,199 |
Place in performance rating | 224 | 221 |
Price now | $699.99 | $1,200 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.74 | 15.97 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,230 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |