AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 154
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 322 vs 154

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1011 MHz
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 vs 1035
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 vs 4468
  • Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 404
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1850
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1850
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3180
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3180
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1072 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1176 MHz vs 1011 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1127 vs 1035
Geekbench - OpenCL 5982 vs 4468
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 506 vs 404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3065 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3065 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3180
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1035
1127
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
322
154
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4468
5982
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
404
506
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
3065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3180
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3180
3357
Name AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1035 1127
PassMark - G2D Mark 322 154
Geekbench - OpenCL 4468 5982
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 404 506
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3180 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3180 3357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2132

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Maxwell
Code name Raven GM108
Launch date 1 February 2018 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 991 1184
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1011 MHz 1176 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1072 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 1,870 million
Floating-point performance 903.2 gflops
Pipelines 384
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus