AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M275
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1162
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1162
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3180 vs 1717
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3180 vs 1717
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 28 January 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3180 vs 1717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3180 vs 1717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 1035
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 322
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 4468
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 vs 1035 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 322 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 vs 4468 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1035 | 1115 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 | 569 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4468 | 9231 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3180 | 1717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3180 | 1717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Raven | Venus |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 28 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 991 | 993 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |

