AMD Xbox One S GPU vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Xbox One S GPU and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Xbox One S GPU
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 914 MHz
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 43.87 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 1,404 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2132 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 914 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s vs 43.87 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops vs 1,404 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2132 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Xbox One S GPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| Name | AMD Xbox One S GPU | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2243 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Xbox One S GPU | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Durango 2 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 2 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 359 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,404 gflops | 10,974 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 3584 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.87 GTexel / s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 11,800 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | N / A | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.22 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2132 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |