AMD Xbox One S GPU vs AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparative analysis of AMD Xbox One S GPU and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Xbox One S GPU
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 43.87 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,404 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.87 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,404 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2132 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2132 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Xbox One S GPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Name | AMD Xbox One S GPU | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Xbox One S GPU | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Durango 2 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 6 July 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1083 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,404 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.87 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | N / A | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.22 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2132 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
