ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000

Comparative analysis of ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000

Around 23% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 325 MHz
Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 620 MHz

Core clock speed	400 MHz vs 325 MHz
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	130 nm vs 150 nm
Memory clock speed	800 MHz vs 620 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000

Name	ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO	NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000
PassMark - G2D Mark		146
PassMark - G3D Mark		18

Compare specifications (specs)

	ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO	NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000
Essentials
Architecture	Rage 8	Rankine
Code name	R300	NV30
Launch date	22 January 2003	21 January 2003
Place in performance rating	not rated	1117
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	325 MHz	400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	130 nm
Texture fill rate	2.6 GTexel / s	3.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count	110 million	125 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x S-Video	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	AGP 8x	AGP 8x
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x Molex
API support
DirectX	9.0	9.0a
OpenGL	2.0	1.5 (2.1)
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	128 MB
Memory bandwidth	19.84 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	620 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	DDR	DDR2