ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 204 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 10.8x more texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 240 vs 80
- 7.4x better floating-point performance: 708.5 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Name | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 73 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | RV620 | GT200B |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 23 December 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1201 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1476 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 51.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 181 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VHDCI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 159.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |