ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon X1050
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V8800 and ATI Radeon X1050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 41.3x more texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 46.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 49
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 245
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 April 2010 vs 7 December 2006 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 vs 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 245 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1050
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 24 Watt vs 208 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 24 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V8800
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1050
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI Radeon X1050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 | 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.27 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI Radeon X1050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Cypress | RV370 |
Launch date | 7 April 2010 | 7 December 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 711 | 713 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1600 | |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 208 Watt | 24 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | 5.33 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 666 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |