ATI FirePro V9800P vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V9800P and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800P
- 22.7x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
- 33.3x more pipelines: 1600 vs 48
- 28.3x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 18.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V9800P
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Name | ATI FirePro V9800P | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 751 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 442 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 442 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1570 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V9800P | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Cypress | GF108 |
Launch date | 9 September 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1388 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1600 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s | 3.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | (G)DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |