ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 580 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 149 vs 126
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1697 vs 800
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1697 vs 800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 149 vs 126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1697 vs 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1697 vs 800 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 61 vs 19
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 61 vs 19 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 149 | 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 19 | 61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1697 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1697 | 800 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | M92 | MCP7A |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1629 | 1631 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 108.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | |
Texture fill rate | 5.44 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 242 million | 210 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |