NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 5.44 GTexel / s
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 108.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 149
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 19
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 5.44 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 108.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 vs 149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 19 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- 1600x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1697 vs 1155
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1697 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1697 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1697 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 19 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1697 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF119 | M92 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1629 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 680 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 108.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 5.44 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |