ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 320 vs 240
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 320.0 gflops vs 288.48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 401 vs 292
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3262 vs 2648
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3262 vs 2648
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 6 November 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 320.0 gflops vs 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 vs 292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3262 vs 2648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3262 vs 2648 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 344 vs 320
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 344 vs 320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 | 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3262 | 2648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3262 | 2648 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
Code name | M96 | R600 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 6 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 772 | 773 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 320.0 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |