ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 7.3x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 401 vs 102
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 223
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 25 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 vs 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 vs 223 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 | 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | 223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3262 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3262 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Curie |
Code name | M96 | NV41 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 25 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 772 | 774 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 320.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 514 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 18.88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 590 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |