ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5850 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 1440 vs 320
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1970 vs 401
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 400 vs 320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 September 2009 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1970 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 400 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 151 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5850
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1970 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 400 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5850 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Cypress | M96 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 30 September 2009 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 766 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1440 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |