ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs ATI Radeon X600 PRO
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and ATI Radeon X600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 13.5x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 36 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 463 vs 67
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 vs 252
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 36 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 vs 67 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 vs 252 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | ATI Radeon X600 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | 67 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | ATI Radeon X600 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Rage 9 |
Code name | M96 | RV370 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 709 | 712 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |