NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 675 MHz
2x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 463
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 375
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2907
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2907

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 February 2014 vs 9 January 2009
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 675 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 463
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 2907
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 2907

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3901

463

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

521

375

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

2907

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

2907

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901	463
PassMark - G2D Mark	521	375
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	2907
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	2907
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Code name	GM107	M96
Launch date	18 February 2014	9 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	707	709
Price now	$299.01
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	675 MHz
CUDA cores	640
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	640	320
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	21.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	514 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...	No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer)
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio)
PCI-E 2.0 x16
Powerplay