NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1600 MHz
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3931 vs 463
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 375
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2907
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3931 vs 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2907 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 219 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3931 | 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 | 375 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2907 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF110 | M96 |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 708 | 709 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 480 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |