ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 80 vs 72
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
Pipelines | 80 vs 72 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1595
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1595
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 vs 1595 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1595 | 2120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1595 | 2120 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | M92 | GT215 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1564 | 1565 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 115.2 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 5.76 GTexel / s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 242 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 72 | |
Gigaflops | 233 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |