NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.76 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1595
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1595
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.76 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 vs 1595 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 672 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 285 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 74 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1326 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 | 1595 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF108 | M92 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1563 | 1564 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 720 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | 5.76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |