ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT and ATI Radeon X800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 48 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 119 vs 65
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 190
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2007 vs 1 May 2004 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 vs 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 5.7 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 5.7 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT | ATI Radeon X800 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 119 | 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 190 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 617 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT | ATI Radeon X800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | R400 |
Code name | RV610 | R423 |
Launch date | 28 June 2007 | 1 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 917 | 920 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 52 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | |
Texture fill rate | 2.6 GTexel / s | 5.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 180 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |