NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 13.9x more texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 22.2x better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 21.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 vs 119
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 617
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops vs 52 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 vs 119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 617 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 225
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 | 119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 617 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV610 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 918 | 920 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 52 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 2.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 180 million |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1270 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
