ATI Radeon HD 4200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 372 vs 96
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 September 2009 vs 8 January 2009 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 vs 96 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 40
- 3.5x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 512 MB
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 112
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 485
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2x 240 vs 40 |
| Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 vs 485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 vs 485 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 4200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 96 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 112 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 485 | 3107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 485 | 3107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 4200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RV6xx | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV620 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 10 September 2009 | 8 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 919 | 920 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 2x 240 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1792 MB |
| Shared memory | yes | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| HDCP support | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |