ATI Radeon HD 4570 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4570 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4570
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 104 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 979 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | RV710 | GT200B |
Launch date | 25 November 2008 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1303 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 242 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |