ATI Radeon HD 4650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4650 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 48 Watt vs 125 Watt
Launch date | 10 September 2008 vs 21 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 46.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 448.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 448.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1891 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1891 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4650 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV730 | G92 |
Launch date | 10 September 2008 | 21 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1586 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 448.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 46.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 193 mm | 229 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |