NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and ATI Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 48 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 42 vs 30
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1891
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1891
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 48 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 vs 1891 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 vs 1891 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 121.44 gflops
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 vs 218
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 121.44 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 vs 218 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | ATI Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 | 250 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1903 | 1891 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1903 | 1891 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GT216 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 10 September 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1584 | 1586 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 121.44 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 182 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 48 Watt |
| Transistor count | 486 million | 514 million |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 193 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| SLI | ||
