ATI Radeon HD 4770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 640 vs 64
- 5x better floating-point performance: 960.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 898 vs 679
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3221
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3221
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2009 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 vs 679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3221 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 97
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 97 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 679 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 | 308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 | 3221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 | 3221 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV740 | G94 |
Launch date | 28 April 2009 | 3 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 783 | 784 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 19 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 826 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 203 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |