NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 902
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 93

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 247 Watt
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3346
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3346

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3017 902
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	428 93
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 8618
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 8618

Compare specifications (specs)